this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
-8 points (40.5% liked)

Linux

13179 readers
254 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] SamueruSama@programming.dev 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

If you talking about the infrastructure cost, then yeah it flatpak would be 'better'. since all your users would use the same runtime and you only have to ship the binary.

But this only makes sense for the first time the user downloads the application, because it turns out appimage can do delta updates just like flatpak lol

In practice not even the first point is true btw, a lot of flatpaks often ship bundled in dependencies (due to having compat issues with the flaptak runtime), so the donwload size of the .flatpak alone is similar or bigger than the one of the appimage.

[โ€“] just_another_person@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

๐Ÿคฃ

My gawd. The hoops you jump through. Just take the L and walk on, slugger.

[โ€“] SamueruSama@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago

Didn't know that measuring and comparing means I'm jumping thru hoops.