this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
16 points (94.4% liked)
Space
9126 readers
35 users here now
News and findings about our cosmos.
Subcommunity of Science
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That isn't really how contracts work, NASA is paying Lockheed to do the work and certify its good to go. Unless there is some meeting where Lockheed engineers were saying "the pee gonna freeze" and NASA said nope we have to go we don't have time to fix it (sort of what happened with Challenger), its up to Lockheed to deliver what they were paid to. In this case a working human spaceflight certified capsule.
It seems plausible to me that a noncritical system like this wouldn't be specifically called out in the certification of the capsule, we have only made a few like this before, and the worry is more "will this blow up and if something goes wrong can we fix it" not "is the pee tube warm".
I do think NASA should be more involved in the engineering of these things, but the rich want to mine asteroids or whatever, so they lobby for private spaceflight and that's what we've got now. Thus the corporations get the blame when they screw up, not NASA.
Orion isn't Dragon, Starliner, or Dream Chaser, though. There was much much heavier NASA involvement in all the minute requirements and designs compared to those other examples.