412
EDIT: Since I mentioned it I might as well link it
this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
412 points (97.5% liked)
linuxmemes
30969 readers
1176 users here now
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
- Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
- Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
2. Be civil
- Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
- Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
- Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
- Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
- Bigotry will not be tolerated.
3. Post Linux-related content
- Including Unix and BSD.
- Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of
sudoin Windows. - No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
- Don't come looking for advice, this is not the right community.
4. No recent reposts
- Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
5. π¬π§ Language/ΡΠ·ΡΠΊ/Sprache
- This is primarily an English-speaking community. π¬π§π¦πΊπΊπΈ
- Comments written in other languages are allowed.
- The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
- Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
6. (NEW!) Regarding public figures
We all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations. - Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
- We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
- Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed. Β
Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
LMAO Cursing your friends isn't nice, CachyOS is for those that are comfortable with Linux...And the dreaded Arch.
Cachy is great for newbies. There's no tweaking required, at least not more than mint. The AUR has all your weird niche programs you had on windows that apt and flatpak don't have. It just works out of the box.
So you say, but, the installer...Man that thing doesn't want to work with my system (even with secure boot off). It was the one that had the most failures with not creating a boot record, installing the kernel, or the NVIDIA drivers. Other distros have vert polished and sleek installer experiences. CachyOS, in my personal experience I don't find it to be a good one. On paper, it is (I did a lot of reading to figure out how to get CachyOS installed).
That's unfortunate. I have gotten 3 of my non-Linux friends to install it and everything "just worked", I hadn't heard of any issues like that before.
Yeah, well there is a first time for everything! I am the person that any arch installer fails for, EndeavourOS was probably the most infuriating failure...As it wouldn't automatically set-up my drives and told me to do it manually. I try that and GPT keeps changing my allotted GBs to every partition, it's a thing for me to find every problem.
I heard cachy was better than average arch in complexity. I am very new to Linux with minimal computer skills and have been very happy with bazzite but most of my friends I try to convert are cachy loyalists
CachyOS is still going to demand more from you than Bazzite in terms of computer skills...Manual interventions (because the Arch Team cannot help themselves but move too fucking fast). Not like I can complain about that, given I have openSUSE Tumbleweed installed and am in SELinux range.
Bazzite is nice, as it can be as simple or as complex as you'd like!
I am loving, loving KDE and Bazzite. It feels like such a mature operating system compared to ol' Windows :D
It is. Fedora is on version 44
Oh yeah? Windows 98 will blow you out of the water!
Arch isn't necessarily unstable or "dreadful". It's a distro that requires the user to know what they're doing and to be a tinkerer by nature. Whether this is a feature or a downside is dependent on the user.
But I agree with you, recommending an Arch based distro to someone who is not a tinkerer and just wants to use the PC - which is the vast majority of PC users - is a mistake.
PS: I use EndeavourOS btw
I am exaggerating for effect, as all of my Arch experiences (never being able to pass the installer without a fatal error or showstopper) are all I know. Its quite vexing that getting other distros installed and configured is easy for me.
I do recognize the power of and capabilities of the distro. Yet, its never been at my fingertips; I must not know the soft, gentle latin curses required to make an Arch install successful.
I even tried to install EndeavourOS and CachyOS. To be met with failure and the need to retreat to another distro.
Better than normal Arch I guess.... idk I would give beginners Mint, Ubuntu or maybe Debian.
I'd recommend Ubuntu or Mint for most new users; straight up Debian only in cases when the user don't need the latest or greatest in terms of updated packages. As Debian is great, I've used it as extensively as Ubuntu...
However, Debian is built against older drivers and kernel, making it stable, if not a bit stale.
Ubuntu is a bit fresher with a higher kernel version (packages can still be behind something like openSUSE or Arch, Debian based distro truth). However, flatpaks allow for more recent software versions!
I install most of my software via Flatpak and Snap anyway, so I don't need the latest and greatest in terms of apt packages, and Debian brings the benefit of a rock solid base.
I agree, so many people disregard Debian, but if you're not gaming and don't need to keep up with the latest things - Debian is rock solid and most of your packages you can just use flatpak. For the majority of daily users who aren't gaming, I think it's a super solid choice.
i don't recommend ubuntu anymore. recently tried it on my laptop and holy hell it's bad. couldn't install flatpaks and the only way to install from repo was to use terminal. couldn't get any version of steam to work at all. and I've been a linux user for years now...
also for some reason mint wouldn't install on the same thinkpad, the installer wouldn't boot at all, just gave some grub message. also fedora was no success, the usb media wasn't recognized. ultramarine finally worked even though it's just fedora with tweaks. some say it's a bad thing to have tons of distros, but for me it's been a blessing. one distro won't work for every pc.
I was pretty successful doing the terminal commands necessary to make flatpaks work on Ubuntu in recent memory, as out of the box the distro is Snap centric. Its odd you had so many issues on a fresh install of Ubuntu. Oof, sounds like my legendary problems with Arch.
Yeah, Mint requires some workarounds on older hardware. Its possible, but, probably not worth it unless you've got a burning desire to use Mint on that hardware.
i looked up multiple guides to enable flatpaks and all i achieved was that i could install them from terminal, but the apps never actually appeared so i couldn't run them.
took me a while to realize the default store is snap only, but i couldn't install another store either (can't remember why). if i wasn't so pissed i probably could've figured it out, but steam not working was too much of a dealbreaker that it wasn't worth the effort
Something fundamental must have been wrong with your install and you needed to do a total reinstallation of Ubuntu. As personally I had no issues with that, I was able to install the Flatpak for Warehouse and then used Warehouse to install/manage other flatpaks (I prefer that over installing yet another store).
I've only recently dipped into it
I've been using Kubuntu though for awhile on all but 2 of my systems, my NAS and my main rig. I'm testing CachyOS though and I'm seeing no issues so far.
Of course once I've got KDE up it all looks like it should lol
It's always a matter of time with Arch...Always. Hell, the damned thing wouldn't install the 4 times that I tried. (checks notes) Failed to install the boot loader, fatal issue with installing the OS, failed with installing the kernel twice. You got lucky, I swear Arch (LOL) hears the mad shit I talk and readies the mortar to blast my chosen installer with condensed malice.
Any other distro and it's installed within 9 to 15 minutes, then I'm ready to customize...
First Arch based distro I used was Manjaro. Served me well for the time despite the criticism, but I had a lots and lots of configuration to do for my needs, specially as a nooby. Since moved to CachyOS after the latest Manjaro debacle and said fuck that shit.
Was pleased that CachyOS was pretty much ready for my needs out of the box.
This is what I always hear, but Arch eludes me...
I've developed a deep appreciation for openSUSE Tumbleweed as a rolling release, that gives me more up to date repos for software and packages.
No real struggles save for me being a goose on the loose and doing something "that seemed fine", but didn't work like it was intended. ROFL or SELinux being its strange self after an update. That was easy to fix with an auto touch command and a few others (forgot to document).