this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
319 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

83502 readers
2888 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

...because VPNs obscure a user’s true location, and because intelligence agencies presume that communications of unknown origin are foreign, Americans may be inadvertently waiving the privacy protections they’re entitled to under the law...

...VPNs might protect you against garden-variety criminals, but the intentional commingling of origin/destination points by VPNs could turn purely domestic communications into “foreign” communications the NSA can legally intercept (and the FBI, somewhat less-legally can dip into at will)...

Certainly the NSA isn’t concerned about “incidental collection.” It’s never been too concerned about its consistent “incidental” collection of US persons’ communications and data in the past and this isn’t going to budge the needle, especially since it means the NSA would have to do more work to filter out domestic communications and the FBI would be less than thrilled with any efforts made to deny it access to communications it doesn’t have the legal right to obtain on its own.

Since the government won’t do this, it’s up to the general public, starting with everyone sharing the contents of this letter with others. VPNs can still offer considerable security benefits. But everyone needs to know that domestic surveillance is one of the possible side effects of utilizing this tech.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jve@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And how does this affect bandwidth, again?

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Net Neutrality was repealed in the U.S. in 2017. ISPs including your mobile phone carrier are allowed to throttle your bandwidth based on the sites you visit. When you use a VPN an tunnel your DNS through it to servers not operated by your ISP, they don’t know which sites you’re visiting, so any automated throttling would not happen.

[–] jve@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hm yeah this one makes sense.

Guess I’m the asshole this time.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Can hardly blame you for failing to keep up with the breakneck pace in which the U.S. government has been assaulting our freedoms and privacy. Some new fresh hell every day an all.

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Routing. Back in the day, Charter customers experienced horrible download speeds using Charter’s DNS servers.

Switching to Google’s would result in far more reliable network speeds.

Tell me you’re a dickhead without telling me you’re a dickhead.

[–] jve@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Charter customers experienced horrible download speeds using Charter’s DNS servers.

How did that work? Are you saying that charters dns servers were sending traffic to completely different places?

Tried to google for this but found nothing so hard to understand the problem.

Why not just switch dns servers instead of getting a vpn?

Tell me you’re a dickhead without telling me you’re a dickhead.

Yeah fair. Got me there.

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dunno about where Charter was routing. Just knew it was a common best practice for users in my town to manually set their DNS to Google.

Charter became Spectrum and since then this hasn’t been a need.

So far as cellular goes, I don’t think I can manage my IP settings on the phone as one would on Windows. I already use VPN if I travel or use public WiFi, and learned that, holy shit, my speeds are far better while connected than not. So I stay connected almost all the time. It’s counter intuitive, but I can’t argue with the results.

[–] jve@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As a long time Charter/Spectrum customer (yay local monopolies) who’s toyed with my network a bit, I have heard about some of their network shenanigans, but they don’t seem to have hit my area. Guess I’m surprised it’d be defeated by something a simple as dns servers, and the MITM of it all if they’re redirecting traffic is terrifying, what with https and all.

I don’t think I can manage my IP settings on the phone as one would on Windows.

Certainly you can change your dns server on nearly any phone.

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I see where I can change DNS for WiFi in iOS settings, but cellular requires an app. It sounds like VPN without the security?

If Verizon is throttling, would that be circumvented by a VPN connection?