this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
146 points (88.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

41528 readers
539 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] webp@mander.xyz 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Could be killed by religious people? 200 years isn't exactly the stone ages.

[–] Melobol@lemmy.ml -4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Go to some arabic backwater town and start talking about Allah. Let's see how long you would last.
Nevermind you can be a cartoonist in France.

[–] webp@mander.xyz 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So you confirm your position that one could have been killed by religious people ~200 years ago. That doesn't really support your argument, which centers around the dawn of civilization.

[–] Melobol@lemmy.ml -5 points 4 days ago

No my argument is that morality is based on religion. Your argument is that you don't need religion for morals.
I reiterated that you do not need religion for morals any more. And I made a point that you needed religion 200 years ago to stay alive and that even some places you still need it to stay alive.
Then you were confused about the 200 yrs - and I pointed out that you still need religion in couple places to stay alive.
And now you are having a gotcha moment because religious people kill people just like any fanatics do. Just look around to all the freaking conflicts going on right now.
And btw in their eyes they are on the moral high ground - they are right - so religion is a basis of morality and society.