this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
196 points (98.5% liked)
Memes of Production
1485 readers
1194 users here now
Seize the Memes of Production
An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.
Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.
Other Great Communities:
founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's curious, because overwhelmingly what is seen in these conversations are self-proclaimed leftists who neither kill nor criticize right-wingers, but find any reason to condemn anyone with any chance of making any change as some form of centrist. See: the reaction to Zohran Mamdani.
Want is not the same as doing, that takes a lot to drive people to radicalise enough to do so.
And why criticise a right winger? They won't read it or learn from it. What a waste of effort, there's a least some hope to convert a centrist.
And there is no chance of making any change as centrist under such a 'democracy', they are fleeting changes that can be revoked by the next person to get into power. Real, lasting change requires revolution not reform or voting.
Okay, so the argument is that they want to do something against right-wingers, but do nothing. But they want to do something against insufficiently left-wing centrists, and do do that.
Can you outline to me how this is any different than a given neolib saying they really want to stop conservatives, but only ever seem to actually try to nitpick and belittle progressives?
Because conversations in the public sphere affect how people conceptualize and internalize ideas, apart from the direct conversants. When right-wing ideas are allowed to spread unchallenged, they become more normalized and change the political leanings of the society as a whole.
Okay, but that's separate from the notion that reform or voting are not worthwhile. For that, you have to reject the notion that revolution is affected by conditions in society (which is absurd) and assert that harm to oppressed demographics is immaterial (which is intuitively repugnant).
Reform won't give us socialism. But it alleviates suffering and can put us in a better position to strike for socialism.
The eight-hour day fucking sucks, but without it, we would be in WORSE organizing conditions in the modern day. Universal healthcare does not solve unequal access to healthcare systems, but few would argue that it was pointless for the UK and every other civilized country out there to pass.
In any case, the objection made here is that self-proclaimed leftists who only punch left-of-society's-center, but never seem to find any even vaguely comparable amount of time to punch right-of-society's-center, is legitimately not a fucking good thing.
I couldn't have said it better myself!