Selfhosted

60320 readers

472 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

Haven't been as busy as you guys, but still wanted to show off (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 months ago by EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

What's everyone's server naming scheme?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I think you choose a poor example.

When I say long name I wasn’t implying meaningless ones.

Sooo, that example wasn't exactly "contrived" - it's based on a standard I see where I work.

DB - it's a database!
DW - and a data warehouse at that!
ORCL - It's an Oracle database!
HHI - Application or team using / managing this database
P - Production (T for Test - love the 1 char difference between names!)
01 - There may be more than one.

This is more what I'm arguing against - embedding meta-data about the thing into its name. Especially when all of that information is available in AWS metadata.

[Site][service][Rack] makes sense for on-premise stuff - no argument there.

I’m just saying long names dont have to be obtuse or confusing.

Agree

[–] EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Not to butt in into your conversation, just wanted to drop that me and my colleagues use what we call the "clone cars" method to combat our company's naming scheme

So for example we dubbed CAPROD01 "Cappy" NASPROD01 became "Nasir" LTPDEV02 became "Luigi" (because he's always number 2)

Of course in written communication we use the full name (which is much less of an inconvenience) and we always double check in conversation or spell out full names before doing anything critical