this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
466 points (98.7% liked)

Selfhosted

60482 readers
484 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] webkitten@piefed.social 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Pretty flawless update from the apt repo on my end.

Server version 10.11.7  
[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think what went wrong and now everything is installed through Docker.

Docker feels like a huge security problem to me.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why?

Docker makes everything so much easier

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I know, but your security then depends on the package maintainer to keep the image up to date

[–] phobiac@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Am officially maintained Docker image is no less a security concern than an officially maintained apt repo. Depending on how you set up a container stack it can even be more secure. An attacker gaining root access to a container that you've given extremely selective access to the host machine is far better than them gaining root access to your actual system.