this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
77 points (96.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

15730 readers
594 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago (8 children)

No thanks, this is the same stupid reasoning as "pedestrians should wear hi-vis vests when walking". It offloads responsibility from car drivers to be responsible, to bicyclists and pedestrians. A decent, separated bicycle infrastructure goes much further in terms of safety than "just wear helmet lmao".

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You are comparing apples to oranges.

A high-visibility vest does not protect you at all. Its only purpose is to make drivers pay more attention to you instead of actually protecting you.

A helmet actually protects you. Also not just from some specific danger that shouldn't be there in the first place (cars) but from the results of every possible fall no matter what caused it.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Typically people don't fall by their own, unless if you're talking about the elderly (who are more brittle), or the very young (who drive on low tricycles to learn, and a fall then isn't as bad). A bicycle also typically is much less fast than a car, so when you fall, the damage is also much less bad.

By far most bicycle accidents are caused by other drivers (especially car drivers) not watching out or driving recklessly near them. Or because bicycling paths aren't cleared/salted in winter.

If you wanted to tackle accidents better, you'd prohibit smartphone usage while in traffic altogether for everyone (navigation excepted).

There's a huge difference between falling and falling because a car drove you over. Don't blame the bicyclist. Blame the carcentric infrastructure.

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What reason could you have not to wear a helmet that would outweigh simple safety in the event random disaster strikes?

Similar to how we wear seatbelts, you don't drive expecting to crash, and in a perfect world you wouldn't need it. Accidents happen though, that's why the word exists.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)