this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
1138 points (92.3% liked)

linuxmemes

21282 readers
1337 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     

    Re-creation of someone else's post because the original was removed and I found it funny when I first saw it

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 39 points 1 year ago (17 children)

    Linux: I can't install steam without breaking my system

    [–] Nefyedardu@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago (8 children)
    [–] dhtseany@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

    Unpopular opinion: flatpaks enable lazy developers to keep old versions of required Python dependencies working longer.

    [–] smollittlefrog 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)
    [–] dhtseany@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
    [–] LemoineFairclough@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
    [–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    If only there was a way to bundle it all together, like in some sort of pack...

    I doubt bundling things together in some sort of pack would avoid every problem with python versions I could have. That doesn't prevent a given python version from being marked as "end-of-life" and no longer receiving security patches.

    Most software is produced and maintained for use solely by the company that produced it, and probably by people who are not experts in using python, so hiding the complexity that python versions and dependency versions are coupled seems like a bad idea, especially when one wants to limit the number of versions of the same software that is installed (and therefore re-use executable files to save disk and CPU usage and avoid accidentally using the wrong version of a program).

    I have not interacted with flatpak in a professional environment, so I doubt I have been directly harmed by it. However, reducing the importance of quickly upgrading software after new versions are released is probably harmful overall: performing an upgrade will usually make development easier (so making it harder for me to pitch to managers that an upgrade should be done is harmful to my morale), and incentivizing having multiple versions of the same program accessible on the same system makes surprising problems more likely.

    load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments (12 replies)