this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
351 points (99.2% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

8081 readers
749 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] notsure@fedia.io -5 points 1 day ago (6 children)

we chose these people. it doesn't matter that you did not vote, you chose this. apathy kills, and apparently it kills us.

[–] decipher_jeanne@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like in the case of Putin, it's a very loose definition of the word "choice"

[–] sidebro@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

He blackmailed his political opposition when entering the public eye.

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Hey, beyond apathy, as an outsider, I want to point out the fact that voter registration seems extra complicated in the US, and designed to prevent people from voting. Coupled with voter roll purges, and other measures, it requires extra determination to vote. When I learned how it's done in the US, I was horrified. Some people have to go through a lot just to vote.

Where I live we're all automatically registered. It's the election bureau that makes all the work from what the government already knows about us. We get a card in the mail every election telling us we're registered. That's it. We can also register directly at the polls super easily. AFAIK voter fraud is nonexistent.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Funnily enough, it wasn't complicated at all for me to register to vote in the state of North Carolina. I'll never forget it.

I turned 18, I went down to the DMV to get my motorcycle permit along with updating my teen provisional license for an adult license. I passed the simple little tests, the DMV worker asked me height, weight, eye color, hair color, address. At the time, NC licenses could have one of several state themed backgrounds; the silhouette of the state, the state seal, the Hatteras lighthouse, the Wright flyer, I picked the plane. Want to be an organ donor? Sure. And the next thing she said to me is seared into my brain:

"Okay, we'll just register you for Selective Service...Would you like to register to vote?"

So here's what you do to register to vote in the state of North Carolina. When a woman in a weird half-cop uniform working at the DMV asks you if you wanna, you say "Y-Yeah." and "Which party?" Say "Uhh. Independent?"

I've voted in every election, maybe not every primary but every election, since that day.

[–] notsure@fedia.io 2 points 16 hours ago

...two questions, are you white, are you male...

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

“Which party?” Say “Uhh. Independent?”

Why is there a party affiliation at registering?

[–] korazail@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Primaries.

In many (most? all?) states, you only get to vote in the primary for your registered party, while independent gets a selection. This is likely intended to avoid a spoiler vote, where a democrat might vote in the republican party for the most abhorrent choice -- though I think this is the kind of thing that can backfire and get us a Trump presidency.

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

It's so weird to give that information to a government. Here if people want to vote for internal party elections, they become party members. You register directly with the party and it is entirely independent from the general elections.

Parties have their own elections, members of that party vote for their leader. Then we have general elections where everyone can chose between those parties.

The government has statistics about the number of members for each party, but not who. Knowing what voter is a member of what party would probably break some privacy laws. A vote is supposed to be anonymous.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works -1 points 12 hours ago

Jesus christ stop projecting your party's failure onto us. You don't even know whom we voted for, and it turns out the ones that didn't vote were right all along, so how about you focus on getting a winning candidate and platform and not blaming others for your own failure.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 0 points 18 hours ago

WE sure didn't choose Kamala to run against these people. Maybe the Democratic party ought to be democratic. Anyways, I see no evidence that Kamala would have held Israel back. Biden sure as hell didn't.

[–] notsure@fedia.io -2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I am responsible for my brother's sin

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

You are responsible for the Republicans winning I agree on that part.

[–] notsure@fedia.io -5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

to the downvoter, why do you fear the truth...the only reason to downvote herei is to hide things...

[–] mogoh@lemmy.ml 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I downvoted because I am not a US citizen, yet you said "we" as if this sub-lemmy is only for US citizens. I don't like the language and the US-centric thinking it implies. Thus the downvoting.

[–] notabot@piefed.social 1 points 22 hours ago

I'm not a USian either, so I get your point, but wherever you are, look to your leaders and decide if they're really the sort you want. The OP's point stands in a more general sense than just those two stains on humanity