this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
40 points (97.6% liked)

Programming

26237 readers
516 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It’s a popular joke among software engineers that writing overcomplicated, unmaintainable code is a pathway to job security. After all, if you’re the only person who can work on a system, they can’t fire you. There’s a related take that “nobody gets promoted for simplicity”: in other words, engineers who deliver overcomplicated crap will be promoted, because their work looks more impressive to non-technical managers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Surprised he got as far as he did. Every line of code that touches production should be reviewed.

If it's shit, fail it until it ain't. To allow that shows a distinct lack of technical leadership.

You've since shown far more and that should build trust. Never trust contractors without verification.

[–] Wfh@lemmy.zip 7 points 22 hours ago

It was a long time ago when code reviews were not yet standard practice everywhere. He was also protected by one of the few customer's employees in the team, who was almost universally hated, because they bonded over some controversial political views.

Yeah nowadays this code would never make it past a PR.