this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
215 points (95.0% liked)

Linux

12943 readers
863 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The latest changes implemented in the Systemd repo, related to or prompted by age-verification laws, have made many people unhappy (I suppose links about this aren't necessary). This has led to a surge in Systemd forks during the last days ("surge" because there have always been plenty of forks). Here are some forks that explicitly mention those changes as their reason for forking (rough time ordering taken from the fork page):

Hopefully the energy of this reaction won't be scattered among too many alternatives, although some amount of scattering is always good.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It sucks and is stupid but the alternative is banning Linux.

Good. Have it banned in the one state that probably relies on it the absolute most. Silicon Valley would start to implode and the law would be changed very quickly.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 2 points 6 hours ago

They still have BSD... Ohhhhh wait.

[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

They will not ban it on Servers or for Corporate use, but ban it in youth Centers, in schools, in public libraries, and everywhere else where kids could have access to Computers. This will create another generation of people who only know close source Systems, most likely from Microsoft, who will have no issues with making their Systems compliant to the bindig laws.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They will not ban it on Servers or for Corporate use

That's the thing, the law doesn't differentiate.

[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

as far as I read the law, but i am neither a lawyer or even american, are those Option only needed for Systems with users and a user, as defined by the same law, is

(i) “User” means a child that is the primary user of the device.

The law says nothing about Systems that don't have such a "user", or at least i could not find anything.

So, there could be a valid argument that the law does differentiate.

[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago
  • Providing courses for kids to learn linux? Not longer possible
  • Providing older, but still perfectly fine running, Computers with Linux to low incoming or otherwise in need families? You are now a criminal!

Systems have to be ready and in place when the law becomes bindig and active, it is to late to beginn with the work then.