this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
0 points (50.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

41248 readers
316 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So every time the Celsius Fahrenheit debate comes out, there is always the point made about “Fahrenheit makes more sense, it tells you how is out there: 0 is freezing, 100 is roasting hot”.

And yes, that might be accurate but showcases that USA citizens only care about themselves, they do not even care about physics or chemistry.

The “it works for me therefore it is good” mentality is what they bring to the world and the most clear example is their choice of framing for justifying Fahrenheit over Celsius.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] derf82@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You go if you want to be precise as Fahrenheit is without decimals.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Weather forecasts are only accurate to 1 to 2 degrees Fahrenheit, or about 1 degree Celsius. So the only example you've given where Fahrenheit is "superior" is one where the accuracy is so low that we just shrug and give a number in the middle of the range. This doesn't make using Fahrenheit more accurate, this just makes the scale irrelevant and we use a whole number because having a convention where we skip some would be pointless.

As for being more precise without decimals, I live in a country with half-decent education standards, so decimals and fractions don't scare me.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It isn't about being "scared" of them, it is about them being used.

And we don't just make forecasts, we report actual temperatures.

But whatever, you just want an air of superiority.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 2 points 20 hours ago

Actual historical temperature data is recorded in tenths of a degree Celsius, because full degrees, Celsius or Fahrenheit, aren't accurate enough. They still aren't reported in the media, because they don't matter in an everyday context.

Look, as far as imperial measurements go, Fahrenheit is pretty good. Any temperature scale is going to be arbitrary, and the reasons for Fahrenheit are valid enough. But, frankly, 180 divisions of temperature is nonsensical. The accuracy just isn't necessary in daily life, and isn't enough from a scientific context. And if I'm going to use an arbitrary scale, I may as well use the same one as just about all the other ones that don't have some reason to be divided into multiple different segments, like degrees on a circle. So at that point, you can go decimal, like virtually everything else in the metric system, or you can go with a multiple of 60 for no damned reason besides history.