this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
29 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23245 readers
180 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've read that the CCP, observing how Khrushchev's denunciation of Stalin was catastrophic for the Communist cause globally, never attacked Mao after his death but emphasized on separating "Mao Zedong thought" from Mao the man, whom they say made mistakes in his later years.

Of course it seems intuitive how such a vehement repudiation of the head of the biggest communist state would be detrimental for communism worldwide but how did it actually happen in practice?

Surely communists didn't just become liberals after hearing about le evil communist. Though it certainly must have been grist for the anticommunist propaganda mill.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Oskolki@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My personal take on is is that for various complex reasons CPSU did not manage to establish a strong ideological core that would be able to withstand the cold war. Stalin was simply a useful too to pin all the bad things on while still maintaining the appearance of communism, until it could be overthrown altogether. Who wanted to overthrow it and who did it without thinking? Don't know exactly, probably never will.

A single person cannot and will never in the history on the entire world do anything other than what their own body is capable of, their image, name and stories left will always be infinitely more impactful than their own work, because those stories are shared by the work of others, for their own reasons. It's quite clear who benefits from Stalin being turned into a demonic figure, regardless of their intent their action speak for themselves. It is quintessentially anti-Marxist, anti-materialist to ever treat anything in a vacuum.

I'm going on a tangent but my biggest pet peeve kind of related to this is people throwing out the "I have no enemies..." line which is not profound at all. That kind of thinking is (one of many) reasons USSR got destroyed. There's absolutely enemies out there who exploit you so that they don't need to do shit themselves and you will never be able to convert them from the outside in, they have to be willing to convert themselves.