this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
229 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

82943 readers
2258 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
229
Nvidia "confirms" DLSS 5 relies on 2D frame data as testing reveals hallucinations (www.techspot.com)
submitted 1 day ago by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
58 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Early reactions to Nvidia's DLSS 5 were swift and skeptical, with some observers likening the technology to an Instagram-style filter applied over gameplay footage. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang refuted the allegations, but subsequent clarifications have helped outline how the system actually works – and where it can fall short.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phar@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Demos are very often an example of in progress works or technology. That literally happens all the time.

[–] Epzillon@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Doesnt really matter IMO. If you have known bugs and flaws you dont showcase those, or if they are present in the showcase you atleast adress them and show what is to be expected upon release. NVIDIA just flat out didnt care. As soon as motion increases the artefacting is crazy. How do you even decide that this is remotely good enough for a demo? 

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nvidia hears people like motion blur and AI slop so they put some AI slop in their motion blur.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Ugh. "Everyone is doing BLOOM, lets also do BLOOM but at +150% more!"

I remember that, motion blur came after and now I guess ai 😓

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

:3

[–] justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

"Hallucinations" are an inherent part of the programming.

It is literally impossible to prevent them.

[–] phar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Okay but that is not what the person said or what the poster above quoted as being the best part. I'm not commenting on the overall performance I'm just saying that demos very often are exactly what that sentence implies they shouldn't be.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 20 points 1 day ago

And yet, they chose to demo a broken technology with obvious bugs and flaws. The demos from tech companies are supposed to make people excited, not recoil in disgust.

This isn't some tiny company, either. It's fucking nVidia, who supposedly has the money to create a good demo.