this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
107 points (92.1% liked)

Linux

12907 readers
864 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The optional birthDate field gives other projects a standardized data source for age verification compliance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] whelk@retrolemmy.com 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For me at least, it's less about the age field itself and more about the swift act of compliance with an absurd and overbearing demand

[–] lonesomeCat@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What is the alternative here?

[–] forestbeasts@pawb.social 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not implementing it and going "well okay don't use it in California then", for one thing!

[–] lonesomeCat@lemmy.ml -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not an expert in law. But wouldn't the maintainers be fined if an underage used it in California? Given that they can obtain it without any sort of location spoofing

Not an expert in law either, but I Am pretty sure, that they would not be fined.