this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
194 points (100.0% liked)
Political Memes
11382 readers
1934 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ask people if they're for or against something that the government is doing in a country where you're not allowed to go against the government and you get the result of the majority agreeing? Shocker. That's like asking, "Are you a traitor or not?" Of course they're answering "no."
That's the same issue explained in the article you're citing. You have to look at questions that aren't direct.
Like other data from Levada (that your source is citing as a source for those 70%).
(BTW, the 70% aren't answering "are you for or against the war"? They're answering, "Do you support the army?" And we kinda have a law that doesn't really allow to say "no" to that Edit: and, that's also mentioned in the article)
Peace talks people have been the majority for almost the entirety of this "special military operation" (there's only 1 month in 2023 where it wasn't the case)
The number of people who want peace talks has also been steadily increasing. That's the consensus. The majority wants it to stop.
The 70% you're speaking of consists of 2 groups:
The first group is estimated at about 25-30%, these are the actual people who support the invasion, although recently, they seem to have become increasingly dissatisfied with the results and the government.
The second group will agree with everything that seems to fit the position of the government. They don't have an actual opinion. They're kind of like sheep: they're just trying to survive. Those are the people who take the stance of propaganda, and they are the reason propaganda works in the first place. That's ~40%
The group who is openly against war is estimated at about 15-25%, although its much more difficult to gauge it considering they are thought to be much less likely to answer questionnaires due to the risk of political prosecution.
You are literally arguing that the only numbers that count out of Russia are the ones that agree with your position. Either polling from Russia is real or it isn't. You don't get it both ways.
Read it carefully:
The answer's going to be "pro-Russia"
The answer is going to be "peace"
The wording is extremely important. I'm not saying the polling is fake, I'm not saying that results are wrong.
I'm saying that you need to look at the question and really think what it's about.
Mind you, my source, and your source's source is literally the same Levada. The same series of questions. The same numbers.
Again. You are arguing that the "wording is extremely important" but then misrepresent what the question actually was. Can you at least pretend to argue in good faith or is this all you have?
Then explain how exactly am I misinterpreting it?
And why is your interpretation better? Considering your source failed to mention the question and falsely attributed it to "special military operation" support (I explained how that's incorrect in the first comment)
Also, explain how am I arguing in bad faith? I'm trying to explain my position, yet you aren't giving me yours, choosing to essentially only say that I'm wrong. Isn't that a bad faith argument?