Leopards Ate My Face

9551 readers

163 users here now

Rules:

The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheTechnician27@lemmy.world

418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world

Chief Justice John Roberts says that hostility toward judges has ‘got to stop’ (www.cnn.com)

submitted 1 day ago by resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world to c/leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/44407468

Chief Justice John Roberts warned against personal attacks on the judiciary, telling an audience Tuesday that while criticism of opinions is fair game, “personally directed hostility” is dangerous and must stop.

Roberts did not mention Donald Trump by name and, as he so often does, he went out of his way to stress that the attacks he was referring to were coming from “not just any one political perspective.” However, the chief justice’s admonishment came weeks after Trump said that justices who ruled against his sweeping tariffs were an “embarrassment to their families.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

“originalism” and “textualism” were a fucking death knell for jurisprudence

I might at least have the stomach for these philosophies if they promised some kind of judicial consistency or a tangible stare decisis. Instead, it's pure Calvinball. The courts read the same statutes and precedents in polar opposite ways, purely based on the ideological shifts in conservative media.

It’s impractical and deeply, inherently regressive to think that a few clever slaveholding provincials had everything figured out forever and ever

Sure. But then you've got guys like Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito taking bribes in the open from oligarchs intent on extorting the modern day working class. And you realize its not the latter day slaveholders who are calling the shots.