this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2026
186 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

82669 readers
2308 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] leriotdelac@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's the same as "Google said this". Before AI, Google could say nothing, it's a search engine. Same with gpt - it's a tool to access information from different sources.

Just having information out in the Internet / on a search index / accessed by LLM doesn't make it relevant or credible...

And what buffles me: it's pretty easy to set up gpt to cite sources and provide the links, filtering through sources that a user trusts. Why neither of my friends do it? Why "gpt said" is even an argument in a discussion?...

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Except people just straight up copy paste gpt output. At the very least people would say "I googled and got this result and that result." We've taken what was minimal work and made it minimaler.

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Except information from Google was human made at least to some degree. With LLMs there is no guarantee

[–] nullroot@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

.... Buffalo buffalo buffles