this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
147 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23074 readers
133 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think a material difference between Iraq (v2 anyway) and Ukraine is that they can keep doing the "well Russia was the aggressor" thing indefinitely even if the reality is more complicated.

also yes obviously some libs are still stubborn about Iraq, the worst ones, but for the most part its generally agreed that the Iraq War was a bad thing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zodiark@hexbear.net 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No. Their role is to support it, like Iraq, then lament the consequences after the fact as damage control.

I remember Chris Hedges saying something to that measure in regards to Iraq. The liberal intellectual class is there to support the state and American project.

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I guess I should have been more specific, but when I say "libs" I'm not referring to the thought leaders, I'm referring to the rank and file. (This is generally what I mean when I use the term in a general sense actually).

[–] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

the rank and file will probably follow the thought leaders

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago

Rank and file turned on Iraq before the thought leaders did kinda