Per the dev:

"I don't refuse to document anything, I'm just taking full ownership of all commits. Claude is not a person (sorry to all the people named Claude) and I don't see the point of having it in commit messages. It has a "Sent from my iphone" vibe. It's just advertising."

She also said something to the effect of "if you think the AI code I allow through is noticeably worse than my hand written code, you should be able to tell it apart without me labeling it. I'm tired of your bitching about it because of a tag rather than the actual content"

they will most likely know how to use it properly and ethically

I'd argue that ethical use is not possible:

• Models are trained on stolen/misappropriated/misused data
• Training involves psychologically harmful work from ghost workers
• Those services runs on infrastructure that no one wants around, and wastefully contributes to climate change/global warming

Yeah what rubs me wrong is that they went out of their way to hide it and are proud of it

It's at times like this I like to point out examples like surgeons Ben Carr(?) and Dr. Oz as counter examples that you can be very knowledgeable about something but also very unwise or morally bankrupt it simultaneously.