this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
154 points (93.8% liked)

Opensource

5735 readers
399 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this "issue" might come up so I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not.

sauce 1

sauce 2

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] forrgott@lemmy.zip 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Except, of course, that this not an imagined or even unlikely outcome; so, no, by definition your link fits not apply.

Maybe read what you link???

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works -1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

'It works fine now, but what about after years of this very recent development?' is absolutely imagined.

You wanna argue for it? Argue. Don't posture.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

It doesn't work fine now, though; that's the whole point. Vibe coding has resulted in numerous public failures, many of them costly. All avoidable.

The tech debt involved is not some imaginary thing. A bullshit generator on steroids giving you magic coding power is, however, completely imaginary.

And telling someone else "don't posture"?!? Then explain YOUR argument! Are you for real?!?

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻