this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
48 points (98.0% liked)

Gaming

4608 readers
176 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I believe this is a targeted attack on steam, too many law suits so close together and none of their "competition" are facing anything even though they do the same things, just a lot worse

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Apparently valve gets sued a lot, most of it just doesn’t hit the news. One of the perks of being so successful!

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Sometimes, refunds, it is a beneficial thing to sue them (I know there are a few more things they got sued for that made steam better for us)

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org -1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Well yeah, not everyone is operating in bad faith and hoping for a payout. This one is probably okay even, though I don’t see them getting as much as they’re asking

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's likely the reseller marketplace aspect that made them select valve, because it's only gambling in the jurisdiction they are pursuing the case if the gambling rewards have real-world value.

So the fact you can buy and sell the loot you win from gambling in the official steam marketplace with a $$ amount explicitly associated is somewhat good proof that not only is there a real value, but Valve themselves have already admitted there's a real value.

But yeah. I don't personally have any dislike for steam in particular, but I'd love to see loot boxes disappear.

Honestly, I'd love to see absolutely everything that encourages compulsive and addictive spending in games made illegal. No random loot boxes, and no "pay to win" either (even if it's guaranteed what items you get)

The only things game publishers should be allowed to charge for in my opinion are cosmetics that have no function, and content updates and expansions.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm willing to bet a decent chunk of this is getting spurred on by Microsoft and Sony in the background to take down Valve before they can help get Linux in a position where it can overthrow both Windows and Playstation for gaming.

Epic's probably playing a part too, since Time Swiney is a petty bitch

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

By whom though? The competition does this shit too

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 1 points 1 week ago

They're the largest entity that has affected the most people?