this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
126 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

11297 readers
2149 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 hours ago (6 children)

Does Iran actually have the capability to close the Strait though? I thought every naval asset they have has been flattened.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 minutes ago* (last edited 4 minutes ago)

Trade ships will redirect at even the threat of being met with any confrontation. It is not worth the risk. Iran doesn't need a Navy to do this either. They need a couple dudes with AKs in a speedboat.

For more info. Just look at Yemen's blockade as an example.

Ships aren't gonna risk massive payloads. Insurance won't cover the loss either.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 5 points 1 hour ago

Oil tankers tend to be a pretty risk-averse group. They're not going to risk getting hit and having their multi-million dollar cargo go up in flames, even if the risk of getting hit while transiting the strait is relatively low.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 17 points 2 hours ago

Iran can close the straight with like 2 dudes with RPGs.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Considering it has signficantly affected oil prices. Yes.

A large amount of ships are currently stuck in the persian gulf. A significant portion of this is because they do not want to take the risk. The threat is enough to be effective but Iran is also enforcing it.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I've been wondering the same thing.

It's a baller thing to say. But if they've lost air superiority (or even if it's compromised) then it doesn't mean much.

[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 23 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I read somewhere that Iran can close the strait without a full-scale naval engagement using selective drone strikes and harassing vessels, Iran triggers a spike in maritime insurance premiums which will choke shipping companies. Also because of the narrow width of the strait, also shallow, Iran can use mines, they have both simple contact mines to sophisticated "smart" mines, apparently they possesses one of the largest naval mine inventories in the world.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago

Those are fair points. They don't need to block all targeted traffic. They just have to be enough of a threat/pain in the ass for transportation and insurance rates to go up to an uncomfortable level. It's all about threat and perception.

Sure, the US air force and navy could bomb the shit out of their artillery placements. But given how (relatively) cheap and effective drones are, that might not be as effective as it seems at first.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's not really baller if everyone just ignores them, and joins a US led convoy through the Strait.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 7 points 2 hours ago

Neat, the US taxpayers are going to spend billions of dollars to escort oil for the Arabs. All in order to reduce the value of America's own oil exports. How likely do you think that is?