this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
365 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

82414 readers
4336 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New U.S laws designed to protect minors are pulling millions of adult Americans into mandatory age-verification gates to access online content, leading to backlash from users and criticism from privacy advocates that a free and open internet is at stake. Roughly half of U.S. states have enacted or are advancing laws requiring platforms — including adult content sites, online gaming services, and social media apps — to block underage users, forcing companies to screen everyone who approaches these digital gates.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

How about a system where I can go physically to a shop, show them my id, then the clerk allows me to buy a box of tokens that I picked up myself from the shelf.

I can pay with cash, the clerk just looks at my face and ID, nothing gets entered into the system.

Then I have a bag of tokens that could have various expire dates. Some could last years. They are not tied to any person in anyway but only adults could access them.

And yes, I can totally give it to some kids, but that’s no different than me buying kids alcohol.

[–] Kraiden@piefed.social 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, yes, it's the same process. It's just moving the convenience store to your phone, and instead of being issued a physical ID by the dmv or whoever, you're given a digital one. To be clear, that ID, and therefore your information is stored locally on your device, not in a server somewhere.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

stored locally on your device

While I would trust that for a FOSS app, it would be too easy for a proprietary app to just “backup” your data.

With the physical method, everyone can be sure they are anonymous through common sense.

[–] Kraiden@piefed.social 1 points 22 hours ago

Sure, but I have 2 counterpoints:

  1. There's no reason the 3rd party app needs to be proprietary. This is starting to get technical, but my understanding is that you get a cert from the requester, and it's the combination of that with the state issued magic cert that's used for validation. The 3rd party app is essentially just a calculator. It doesn't need any certs of its own

  2. That's an implementation detail. My argument is that it's the implementation that's the real cause for concern here, not the idea