this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
19 points (95.2% liked)

askchapo

23237 readers
102 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

To explain, I'm just a big old ignorant layman, but with other scientific fields I at least CONCEPTUALLY understand how they came to their findings.

Like if a Geologist tells me something about rocks I'm like: "Okay, idk how geology works, but I assume you did some kind of experiments involving rocks so you probably know what you're talking about."

Or if a neurologist tells me something about the human brain: "Okay, idk shit about neurology, but I assume you did some kind of brain scan or took some brain samples or did some kind of scientific experiment thingy to know this stuff about brains. I don't know the exact details but I can at least abstractly understand the process by which you learned this thing you're telling me now."

Then I'll see some news report about some finding a theoretical physicists made and it'll be like: "The Universe is made of strings! And also the sun is a black hole! The universe is shaped like a doughnut!"

And my honky ass is just like: "How the fuck do you know that shit? What are you looking at? How did you figure that crap out?"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So do you know any physics or are you just saying things?

[–] xijinpingist@hexbear.net 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This is the appeal to authority logical fallacy.

[–] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Damn I didn't realize Mao was committing a logical fallacy when he said "No investigation, no right to speak"

[–] xijinpingist@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

Whatever that is, the CPC doesn't believe in it and hasn't for a long time. Mao was 70% right and 30% wrong. He was wrong a LOT. Eespecially Jiang Qing, who was a queen evil and member of the Gang of Four

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So no?

i-think-that knowing what you are talking about is a basic prerequisite for discussion.

If you are being genuine then please leave the whining about fallacies back on Reddit.

[–] xijinpingist@hexbear.net 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Genuine? I am an actual commie propagandist. I make real-live propaganda for card-carrying members of the communist party. Of my own free will. I don't even get paid! You really want to play this game?

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As a commie you are obliged to self-crit and not speak nonsense about things you have not researched.

[–] Blakey@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

...asking whether YOU know anything about the subject under discussion has literally nothing to do with an appeal to authority, are you OK?

As a commie propagandist you should be familiar with this old saw: no investigation, no right to speak! Was Mao doing an appeal to authority, too? Or is that just a reasonable expectation for any sensible person to have?