PieFed Meta

4084 readers

78 users here now

Discuss PieFed project direction, provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics.

Wiki

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

rimu@piefed.social

How does PieFed improve voting compared to Reddit/Lemmy? (piefed.zip)

submitted 13 hours ago by MindfulMaverick@piefed.zip to c/piefed_meta@piefed.social

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I’m trying to understand how PieFed’s voting culture is different. I’ll admit, I usually upvote things I like and downvote the rest. Sometimes, if a post has a low score, I don't even read the title, I just downvote and move on. I suspect I’m not the only one who does this.

I know PieFed shows "Attitude" (the percentage of positive vs. negative votes you cast) on profiles, which is a nice touch. But aside from that metric, it doesn't seem to physically limit the act of downvoting.

Are there plans to make voting more meaningful? For instance, I've seen suggestions in the community about restricting votes to subscribers to prevent "drive-by" downvotes from people who aren't part of the community. How does PieFed plan to handle the issue of users reflexively downvoting without engaging with the content?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MindfulMaverick@piefed.zip 0 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Yes that setting. I stop seeing posts after I reload by voting them with that setting enabled.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 3 points 9 hours ago

You need a client that marks a post as read as you scroll by. On Android I use Summit. In a browser Voyager should do. Maybe we get it with Lemmy 1.0 in Lemmy-UI, I don't know.

[–] Microw@piefed.zip 2 points 10 hours ago

in that case, you could simply upvote them instead of downvoting them ;)