this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
110 points (91.0% liked)

Technology

82188 readers
5582 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/39351554

Samtime tries out a Fairphone 6 running Ubuntu Touch and it seemed pretty fine. Noted issues were the second camera not working, GPS/Map app being a bit weird, and imo, the screen showing all the apps you have open is terrible. But with the reg app store and waydroid, I think it could be almost managable to use.

My mom is a battery life fiend though, so that part she won't let go of. What's your thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

For anyone reading this, please consider donating to PostmarketOS or Mobian if you have the means, as it will help us escape the Android ecosystem which is getting more and more anti-user due to google controlling it.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

I would pay for a company to come out with one of these pre-loaded onto a Fairphone. Seriously.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem with PostmarketOS is that it only is stable on extremely old phones that sometimes aren't even midrange.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is certainly not usable for the average person in it's current state, hence why I suggest donating to it to help with developing it.

With proper funding and full-time devs, it would be able to focus on adding proper support to more phones, or potentially partner with a manufacturer like GrapheneOS just did with Motorola to get first-class support on a smaller handful of devices.

Postmarket is our only long-term mobile option that will remain FLOSS and in the users best interest, we just have to support it and help build it up into something we can all use :)

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I have donated and even used it. On said old phones, it works decently well.

The issue is the hardware support, since most people won't want a near decade old phone who's battery you probably need to replace but can't do so easily.

Feels like they need to rally behind a more modern phone and polish that to get people to actually try it rather than fractured development. The Fairphone 4, which they already have a stable release on, would be a good candidate.

Ah well, I'll still keep up my donations anyway. Just feels like they could have more focused leadership, similar to the Linux Kernel.

I also recommend (if you're in Europe) petitioning government bodies to help fund them as well.

[–] linule@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What’s the pitch here? Initial impression is that it makes the ecosystem fragmented, as now (along with Ubuntu Touch), people have at least 3 different projects to fund. There needs to be a core standard that unifies the efforts and funding.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The issue with Ubuntu Touch is that unfortunately it's not a genuine alternative to Android, as it actually relies on Android quite a lot to function as well as it does.

It generally uses an outdated Android kernel (which is also usually not receiving security updates) and a Halium abstraction layer to access the closed source binary blob Android drivers for the phone's hardware. It also requires that it be installed on top of an existing Android install, so in all it's more of Linuxified layer on top of Android, which means it's not truly escaping the control of the Android/Google ecosystem.

PostmarketOS and Mobian are genuinely Mobile focused Linux distros that run the mainline up-to-date Linux kernel, right on the bare metal, meaning they are not subject to any influence from Google.

Both projects often collaborate and benefit from each other, they just use a different base distro (Alpine for PostmarketOS, Debian for Mobian), but that doesn't result in any wasted effort, as ultimately any new developments, drivers, or new phone support are mainlined into the kernel itself, so both projects benefit.

They're not as usable as Ubuntu Touch is right now, but they are ultimately the better solutions long-term to ensure that all the code is under community control so we aren't reliant on outdated unsecure Android components.

[–] linule@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Very interesting and informative, thanks for explaining. My understanding was that UT just conveniently copied/reused some hardware interfacing components from Android, since Android uses a Linux kernel too and why reinvent the wheel, especially with the plethora of phone manufacturers available, which you really don’t want to do again. But I didn’t know about it using Android kernel, or needing an existing Android install, which sound indeed problematic.

I still think that it is important to standarize a canonical Linux core, or something like that, that can unify more development efforts, or if not needed, at least a marketing presence to raise funds. E.g politicians usually don’t understand a word of tech, and you’d need something like “The open source interoperable alternative to Android and iOS” to be appealing instead of coming with Alpine, Debian, etc. which will sound just geeky and fringe and subsequently not get substantial funding.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I still think that it is important to standarize a canonical Linux core

If you're not aware, Ubuntu Touch is no longer operated or developed by Canonical, they abandoned the project in 2017. UT was then picked up by UBPorts, a community effort to keep alive what Canonical left behind.

Personally, I don't have a very high opinion of Canonical due to their use of CLAs, which also appear to be present in some fashion with UT and UBPorts as well:

I agree that some standardization would likely be beneficial in some areas (such as focusing on a single Phone UI and polishing it up). PostmarketOS is making the most progress on getting real Linux on mobile, so if I had to pick one project to support monetarily, and one that could become mainstream, or partner with a manufacturer like GrapheneOS did with Motorola, I think that would be the project to back, IMHO.

[–] linule@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean canonical the word, not company? name.

And ok, interesting to know that PostmarketOS might be what’s closest to that.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Oh, right. Sorry, easy to confuse the meaning in this particular case 😅

[–] linule@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

No problem 😊 thanks again for explaining.