this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
93 points (97.0% liked)

Gaming

4562 readers
137 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

If anyone actually looks through the legislature and the discourse around it:

It is not age verification like you need for pornhub. You aren't giving a photocopy of your license to some org to verify you exist.

It is literally the same logic as "please enter your birthday to continue". Just say you were born on jan 1 1900 or whatever. That will then be fetchable by the app/browser to send when a site requests it.

Which... seems like a really good system? It allows people who care about what their kids do to lock down their accounts. And it provides no meaningful PII for adults (or kids whose parents don't care).

It is a REALLY stupid law but also... it is likely to get something on the books before the "You need to send us your long form birth certificate to install VLC" laws start getting pushed.

[–] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Please atleast use Jan 1 1970

[–] ArchEngel@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Oh wow, if this is it, then it's really not bad at all - easy to setup, client side, easy to ignore, and easy enough for teens to get around it when they feel like learning how. I don't hate this, other than the potential for a dangerous slide towards ID.