this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
521 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

82296 readers
3492 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world -5 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Yeah the amount of heat a data center vs a satellite your going to super heat the space in that orbit over time. It they are geostationary then its even harder as the the data center doesn't move away from the heat.

[–] nabladabla@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Um, it doesn't make the data center in orbit thing make sense, but a geostationary satellite absolute moves at high speed and does not stay in the same place in space.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The heat would be moving at the same speed. Though, that does mean it wouldn't be any better in any other orbit.

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

Heat energy is primarily dissipated as infrared light which moves at the speed of light. There is no way for space to accumulate heat. If that were the case the entire solar system would be unlivable. The IR emitted by satellites is truly negligible in comparison to the electromagnetic radiation emitted by the sun.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)