this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
27 points (64.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

40847 readers
841 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SenK@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That statement dangerously oversimplifies human behavior and stigmatizes neurodivergent individuals, particularly those on the autism spectrum, who may experience empathy differently but are not inherently "bad."

[–] Anuttara@leminal.space 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

omg thank u!!!!!!!!!!!

i was bullied for being "evil witch" when i was in school cuz i was autist and there was the meme that autists "can't feel empathy". i was like... watching cartoons and saw the "bad guys" and i thought i wasn't like them... but then at school they told me i was?? it was awful

thank u for saying this

[–] SenK@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah I have read on empathy and mental health issues. Good vs. Evil aside, it's a terrible and ableist lens to view people through. Sorry you had to go through that.

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They may experience it differently, but if they can act on it, they will be good people. Without being able to act on empathy, no matter how you perceive it, you cannot be good, and refusing to act with empathy towards people and other lives on earth is bad.

[–] SenK@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So if someone literally cannot "act" in some way, you get to decide if they are good or evil?

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

🤷‍♂️ Yeah, kinda. What metric are you using?

[–] SenK@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

First I can look at my own values and discover that I happen to value human well-being. I like it when people are happy, healthy and free of suffering. It doesn't make me a "virtuous" person, I'm a human too so I could be purely guided by self-interest.

Then I can look at science and reason and conclude that by those things, I can generally figure out what kind of things impact human well-being and how.

Then I can look at someone's behavior and conclude that it's either beneficial or detrimental to human well-being.

Then I can look at science and reason again to find out how to address that behavior in order to reduce (or even entirely prevent) harm.

I don't need a moral framework for any of that, and I certainly don't need to judge people as essentially "good" or "evil".

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But why is it a beneficial for other humans to be happy? Why do you like that? That is empathy.

[–] SenK@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My capacity for empathy has nothing to do with anything.

Again: I just happen to value human well-being, and as literally everybody in the universe, I will seek to act in accordance to my values, which usually easily puts me in the same camp as other people who value human well-being.

There are people out there who value "the word of the lord" or something like that more. Like they would prefer to kill wrong-believers because they value their religious text more than human life. They think they are "good" too. I don't agree with them, but if MOST people did, then they would get to decide what "good" is.

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah. That's bad. I don't care what most people think. Treating people with empathy is good. Treating people as objects is bad.

[–] SenK@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I agree that treating people with empathy is beneficial for their well-being.

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How else can you judge someone’s character if not by their actions?

[–] SenK@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

How about not judging? How about just asking if they cause harm or not, and how to prevent that harm.