this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
287 points (97.7% liked)
Greentext
7895 readers
701 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Previous laws regarding murder didn't cover it?
samurai sometimes owned land and were part of the aristocracy, at the very least being retainers of lords and thus being a more privileged class and caste.
And furthermore, this is feudalism, a political and economic system defined by rigid social hierarchy crafted under a might makes right framework. The peasant class was generally considered disposable. Like, you can't kill too many, and crap like this is considered bad form, but if you're a samurai/knight the people with the power to enforce laws see you as one of them and the people with power over them see you as simply more valuable given that you're a serious investment in training and equipment while they're primarily manual laborers who replace themselves and produce the food they consume. But more than that they're so far beneath them socially that their individual humanity is invisible.
Laws for thee not for me
Before that was the warring period. So effectively no.