this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
354 points (98.4% liked)

Linux

63406 readers
578 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Apparently this will include Linux...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vortexal@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I forgot the name, but I saw a BSD distro state that they are going to block users in California when this law gets put into place. I hope that more OSs do the same. Especially Windows, it could be devastating to California's economy and make them, along with other states and countries, reconsider their decisions on age verification.

I don't live in California but I'm interested in seeing if there are any other OSs that will be blocking California users. I'm probably fine to just continue using Linux Mint but I'm open to trying other distros/OSs in order to participate in this protest if Linux Mint doesn't.

[–] Archr@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

In my opinion, it is foolish and shortsighted of these developers to just block the state and move on. (I do live in Cali but hear me out)

Whether people like it or not we are stuck with this law now. A law that leaves all of the implementation details up in the air. The big corporations, Microsoft and Apple, are not going to be pulling out of California. Do we really want to leave all the power to determine how this system works? Leave the 4th largest economy in the world entirely in their hands?

If we ignore what is going on here then we will give up our chance to even propose a minimal acceptable solution to this law. One that does not require ID or face scans.

I desperately hope that the linux foundation is taking this seriously and is already looking at implementing a solution.

This law aims to place at least some of the responsibility back onto the parents that allow their children to run wild on the internet. Is the law perfect? Absolutely not. Would I repeal it if I could? Yes, of course. But this is the hand we are dealt.

(also it is midnightbsd)

[–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I mean, it'd suck for all of us outside of California to have more surveillance just because y'all have that law, and it's absolutely not really about protecting children, it's about surveillance

[–] Archr@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd love for you to go into more detail on how this is surveillance since that seems to be your main concern.

The law does not require providing IDs or face scans or any other identifiable information. There are clauses in the law limiting where the data gets sent to and that if data does need to be sent then it is the minimum that is necessary.

The law only requires that an account holder "indicate[s] the birth date, age, or both, of the user of that device". Outside of the abstract the law not once mentions any type of verification that must happen.

Also it's a California law. It doesn't affect anyone outside of Cali so if you are affected take it up with your os provider or fork your distro.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So the input is not verifiable? This will not work and sounds more that it's not intended to do anything other than shift the Overton Window. California has a huge fascist issue in Silicon Valley.

[–] Archr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The point isn't to verify your age the point is to have the account holder (the parent) attest to the age of the user (their child). If the parent lies and it negatively impacts the child then the parent can be fined.

It also penalizes apps that see the user's age is in a lower bracket and still shows them sensitive content.

There is a huge fascist issue everywhere in the US. SV is not special in that respect.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)