this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
72 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1939 readers
483 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mika@piefed.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Woman definitely can serve and general training for everyone is not a bad idea so that people could try and understand if they like it.

But as far as the real war goes, you won't mobilise womans unless they have very specific skills (medics, mostly), cause someone needs to take care of the children.

Gender equality isn't a top priority during the war, I guess.

[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

someone needs to take care of the children

This is what fathers do as well

[–] Mika@piefed.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not if they are mobilised too.

[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You've kinda fucked yourself over if all the parents are away shooting other people

[–] Mika@piefed.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

When it comes to mobilisation, we are talking about nonvoluntary service. The mobilisation rules need to be simple and easily enforced. So yeah, the simplest way to avoid both parents to be forcefully mobilised is to do this on men only, and add a clause about a single parent in case mother died or is in service.

Otherwise I can't see how it isn't gonna be a mess.

[–] Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Lol, you really are woooshed about gender equality?

[–] Mika@piefed.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

Explain your point