this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
249 points (93.1% liked)

Open Source

46879 readers
61 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Cloak@lemmy.ml
kevincox@lemmy.ml
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml
249
This is really serious, something this essetial can't be AI Vulnerable, save OSS (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 months ago by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
54 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's still on the human that opened the PR without doing the slightest effort of testing the AI changes though.

That makes sense when talking about people's accounts.

A "Claude" account serves PR (as in public relations) purposes, and having to do a stringent human review before submitting a pull request is bad for PR.

Which by no means is me saying submissions from the Claude account need to be banned, but that the "Claude" account's goals are probably to have Claude do all of this "himself" - which is a recipe for disaster.

[โ€“] iByteABit@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

I think Claude account PRs should absolutely be banned, that's the easiest counter measure to implement too