this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
112 points (93.8% liked)

Memes of Production

1282 readers
1124 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I would argue that 'end' implies 'all', aka 'eliminate suffering'.

If it said 'reduce suffering' or 'minimise suffering' that would be different.

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But on the other hand, ending all suffering is such an unrealistic demand that no one would say it seriously. Stubbing your toe is suffering but would anybody prioritize ending it? You can read it as a hyperbole if you will.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago

But that's kind of the point of the OP in the first place. End all suffering, wait not that suffering.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So given the choice between a reading with addressable solutions, and one that can never be achieved and so no one would ever argue for, you intentionally selected the second interpretation. Because this allows you to reduce the argument to an absurdity, and then disregard it. But you're just fucking lying to yourself, you're not really achieving anything except finding a way to arrive at the conclusion that you had pre-selected.