this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
248 points (93.1% liked)
Open Source
45071 readers
201 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What is "AI vulnerable"? What is the problem here? Claude isn't reverse-Midas, it's not like everything they touch turns to shit.
Humans can barely write safe C code, so I definitely don't trust AI to. I'm not even blanket against AI assistance in programming, but there are way too many hidden landmines in C for an LLM to be reliable with.
I use it in C++ and it has been very helpful. The OP appears to be just blanket against AI assistance in programming? There's no indication of what degree Claude was involved here, or what amount of blind trust the human reviewers gave to it.
I agree with you. More to the point...why accept code from anyone (clanker or meatbag) without provenance?
If I don't know you, and you can't explain what it does? Straight into the garbage it goes.
The issue isn’t AI contamination. It’s accepting code from any source without provenance and accountable review.
I suspect the anti-AI push is coming from Russia or China, probably because the AI products that are in such high demand right now are of Western origin.