99
The Epstein Cover-Up: Why did DOJ Hide Records of a Woman Who Made Claims Against Trump?
(thelefthook.substack.com)
this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
99 points (99.0% liked)
The Trump-Epstein Files™
1178 readers
31 users here now
We keep track of the release of the files, but also to explore what’s already available, and why – with enough exposure – this could bring the man down, and who knows even his regime or the empire.
Want to start digging yourself? Check out our sticky post
Our Rules
(Subject to Change)
- #1 Be kind: keep it civil and amicable. The enemy is not in this community but in Palaces, The White House and penthouses.
- #2 Trigger Warnings: required. Mark posts which may be triggering to read or see for victims of sexual abuse with "[TW]" in front of your post title. If you're posting an image or video with explicit thumbnail, you will have to set the entire post as NSFW AND include the TW.
- #3 Cite sources: preferably direct link to the article/pdf and or an archive link in case there is a paywalled. In the article find a relevant few paragraphs and quote them in your post.
- #4 Post the Bates numbers: when referencing evidence (even if it is mentioned in an article), please post
- the Bates number of the file you’re referring to (EFTA00000000)
- a link to the original source
- a link to a mirror of the file in case DOJ pulls the file.
- #5 include key paragraphs: when posting articles, include a few key paragraphs of the article (not the entire article)
- #6 avoid links to social media as sources. Links to twitter must use xcancel.com.
Our Justice System
- First offence: warning + 2 day ban
- Second offence: 7 day ban
- Third offence: permanent ban from community
- Creating multiple accounts to interact with this community: permanent ban for all accounts in community + report to your instance admin.
This community is run by volunteers so please don't test the justice system, as with all justice systems it is critically underfunded.
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Brunel was an aging monster who was finally facing consequences. And again, in France. He had multiple attempts at fleeing the mortal coil, and finally got it right.
Conspiratorial thinking is fun and all, but you end up turning off your brain when you engage in it. You just admitted you know nothing of the case and then declare that he must have been murdered. Do you see the problem here?
You misunderstand, maybe it becomes clear with a re-read.
I am saying I don't accept it, with the info I have, mostly from your post that it's a fact he killed himself (without outside pressure). That doesn't mean I'm saying the opposite is true. It means I am keeping more than two possibilities open, with probabilities instead of absolutes. (suicide, suicded/murdered, mix of the two).
Ah, the mind so open, your brain falls out.
Here's some info.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/02/20/jeffrey-epsteins-former-friend-jean-luc-brunel-made-numerous/
And the investigation following his death.
https://www.lavoixdunord.fr/1416845/article/2024-01-09/affaire-epstein-les-avocats-de-jean-luc-brunel-reclament-une-enquete-pres-de
Brunel wasn't murdered, he committed suicide to escape consequences and as a giant fuck you to his victims. He had initially tried to hide from the cops, then tried suicide multiple times, and finally someone allowed him the opportunity to try one last time.
Even though I don't appreciate the way you ridicule my way of thinking on this from the start, when you demonstrably didn't even get it, I appreciate the additional info coming out of this. :)
Have a good day, fam.