this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
2 points (100.0% liked)

Philosophy

2327 readers
2 users here now

All about Philosophy.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’ve been thinking about the infinite regress problem in observational accounts of quantum theory. Treating observation as fact-generating seems to force either an arbitrary stopping point or an infinite hierarchy of observers.

What I’m still reflecting on is whether this regress is best avoided by reinterpreting observation as fundamentally passive, or whether the decisive move lies deeper—at the level of relational structure itself, where stability and coherence arise prior to any observer being singled out.

If so, the absence of regress may not come from where we stop the chain, but from the fact that no chain is required in the first place.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Laura@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

Even if it can never be fully observed, do you think there is a fundamental reality?

The paper I support does not simply assume reality as a given; it addresses the structure by which reality itself becomes possible.