this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
2 points (100.0% liked)

Philosophy

2327 readers
11 users here now

All about Philosophy.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’ve been thinking about the infinite regress problem in observational accounts of quantum theory. Treating observation as fact-generating seems to force either an arbitrary stopping point or an infinite hierarchy of observers.

What I’m still reflecting on is whether this regress is best avoided by reinterpreting observation as fundamentally passive, or whether the decisive move lies deeper—at the level of relational structure itself, where stability and coherence arise prior to any observer being singled out.

If so, the absence of regress may not come from where we stop the chain, but from the fact that no chain is required in the first place.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Laura@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

If reality is one, is your position simply that it just exists, full stop? The paper I’m referring to actually proposes a clear account even at that level.