this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
294 points (96.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

40677 readers
988 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The internet runs on ads.

Ad companies pay for all the “free” popular social media we use. Ad companies dictate to social media what their clients want their ads to be associated with, not associated with, and drive media of all kinds to push inflammatory and click-bait content that drives engagement and views. It’s why you indirectly can’t swear, talk about suicide, drugs, death, or violence. Sure, you technically can unless ToS prohibits it, but if companies tell their ad hosts they don’t want to be associated with someone talking about guns, the content discussing guns gets fewer ads, fewer ads = less revenue, low-revenue gets pushed to the bottom.

So lowbrow political rage bait, science denialism, and fake conspiracies drives people to interact and then gets pushed to the top because it gets ad revenue. Content that delves into critical thought and requires introspection or contemplation languishes.

Ads are destroying society because stupid and rage sells views.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Capitalism does play a part, but it’s more the lack of hard rules to curb it rather than the economic method itself. You want to make an even broader claim, just say “greed.”

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Couple of things that are either a definition, obvious, or directly observable in literally every capitalist nation in history:

  • the defining characteristic of capitalism is the private ownership of businesses
  • the ability to own a business can buy you influence on the electorate legally, through owning ad agencies, newspapers, think tanks, online influencers
  • owning a business can buy you influence on politicians legally, by hiring lobbyists, by threatening to take your business elsewhere, by promising politicians cushy jobs after their tenure, by contributing to their campaign through fundraisers, PACs, etc
  • this influence gives you the power to change laws and regulations to your benefit
  • in particular, it allows you to shape laws to benefit you financially, making the actions in point 2 and 3 easier to do
  • in particular, it allows you to get rid of laws restricting you to do the things in points 2 and 3
  • it is in the best interest of politicians to deregulate the latter parts of point 3
  • as such, a capitalist system where only parts or even none of point 2 and 3 are allowed, has a natural tendency towards a system where they are fully allowed

Leaving all other economic systems aside for a moment*, the idea that this is not a direct and natural consequence of capitalism doesn't seem to hold water, both on a theoretical and an empirical level.

(*)And we do this because, analogously, arguing your right hand isn't bleeding by saying your left hand is makes no sense. Capitalism can be studied in its own right. What's more is that the number of alternative systems is infinite, and I'm sure lemmy has a character limit.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 1 points 1 hour ago

Yes, exactly, and if you continue in this same vein, fascism becomes inevitable, too. Capitalism really must be abolished.

[–] jmankman@lemmy.myserv.one 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This was an understandable perspective when we had those regulations in the USA, but since FDR's New Deal, the Republicans have walked back practically every law and regulation we had to curb the greed of Capitalism. This is the natural tendency of Capitalism

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is the tendency of people. Any system is open to exploitation and greed. The restrictions on growing exploitation are only as good as the humans enforcing them, and people suck. There’s always people trying to force cracks in a system to benefit themselves, and some tribal influences that will allow them to do it.

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You are 100% correct. People just want to believe that Capitalism is uniquely corrupt. When literally all of human history has seen us exploit and greedily destroy every social and economic system humans have ever engineered. Now including capitalism.

Good regulations prevent critical exploitation, which is why European capitalism is still functional and looked on positively despite still being capitalism.

Only through regulations can an economic system be maintained. US Capitalism is failing because it has been steadily deregulated for the last 40 years.

So yes, Capitalism is poison. But so is blowfish unless you cut it right. Every system we've ever built is also poisoned for failure unless it's always cut down and regulated to its basics.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

European capitalism is still functional and looked on positively despite still being capitalism

I'm really sorry to burst this bubble, but as a European, no. Capitalism is devouring us from the inside out. Haven't you seen that basically every EU nation has a surging far right?

Capitalism is not uniquely capable of being exploited more than the systems which it replaced, but you're wrong that it can be regulated. Yes, regulations can be passed, but they cannot be maintained. Capitalism will inevitably trend towards fascism as a matter of design. It is just human nature.

This is why we need a system that acknowledges the reality of human nature. That's why I'm an anarchist. It's the only system which really accounts for the fact that humans will abuse power for selfish reasons.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's no curbing capitalism. The very thesis of it requires that the most successful 1, find 2, exploit 3, lobby to lock up enough, so to "pull up the ladder behind themselves", any and all loopholes of the legal system that allows them to get ahead.

You can try regulating it but capitalism will always find a way around your rules.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I disagree. Capitalism can be curbed. The failure is greed on humanity’s part always trying to carve out more for themselves. No system of government or economy has proven otherwise over the long term. They all eventually fail.

E: Lol, downvotes seem to indicate some real confident fools here think they have an alternative all figured out that somehow eliminates what humans have been doing forever.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 1 points 1 hour ago

Capitalism can be curbed.

It can't. It always leads to fascism. It always has. It always will.

[–] choui4@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is where we disagree. What are the fundemental tenants of capitalism vs say, communism?

(Just doing a thought experiment with you, in good faith)