this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
650 points (98.8% liked)
Funny
13857 readers
1306 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've yet to have anyone adequately explain how it's not going to rain in the future...
Cooling plants can use runoff water, salt water.... As long as we keep from polluting the fresh water too much it'll continue to be there.
... Do you think it rains enough for everyone to have drinking water now?
Secondly, air pollution can render rain unhealthy to drink. Aggressive environmental regulation, the type that people are currently staunchly trying to remove, are what made it so everyone stopped talking about acid rain.
Thirdly, climate change alters the growth of plants. The growth of plants mediates soil conditions, and soil conditions control water evaporation, drainage, and where rain falls. For an example, consider the dust bowl.
Finally....
That's exactly one of the major concerns!
We've been polluting ground water sources for a while, and there's also a phenomenon where over pumping a ground water source can shift the water table and expose it to ground pollution that it was previously not exposed to.
Its a pretty well covered topic if you're interested in an answer. Here's a TLDR version:
source
source2
source3
An increase in temperature also increases the evaporation rate of water. rain storms will be more intense, but just because the atmosphere holds more water doesn't mean it won't also be releasing more water.
Venus isn't at all comparable to Earth.... That's a literal crazy comparison. If Earth received 30% more solar radiation, didn't have ocean heat sinks (I most worry about global warming because of the cccd rising, not about "where are we going to get water from", between using fossil fuels for combustion to make energy, and the elimination of calcium carbonate life forms in the ocean, we're going to asphyxiate long before we dehydrate, or over hydrate, or whatever we're worried about from the water)
More extreme water patterns doesn't mean less drinking water.
Less ocean bio activity means less breathable air.
Some people are only able to identify the differences using hyperbole. I specifcally called out Venus as an extreme example to highlight the difference in atmospheric conditions. I did not suggest the Earth would become Venus.
I addressed this directly.
Except it does. Yes, the water will be released, but not in the same geographic places and the other conditions created by climate change will mean when it rains far less of that fresh water will be usable or capturable.