Pebble

316 readers

1 users here now

For discussion of the Pebble smartwatch.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

tree@lemmy.ml

moosetruce@lemmy.world

February Pebble Production and Software Updates (repebble.com)

submitted 4 days ago by tree@lemmy.ml to c/pebble@lemmy.ml

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Pebble Time 2 Production Update: We’re in the Production Verification Test (PVT) phase right now, the last stop before Mass Production (MP).

Entering PT2 Mass Production on March 9.

Based on current schedule, the first mass production PT2s will arrive on wrists during the beginning of April. We should wrap up delivering all pre-ordered Pebble Time 2s two months later by the beginning of June.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That Index 01 is atrocious; shame on whoever bought one.

I don't have a particluar need for the Index 01, but I can imagine a good number of people that would benefit from it. Its not particularly glamours but I'm not seeing it as particularly offensive in styling either. What do you find atrocious about it?

[–] erebion@news.erebion.eu 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's a throwaway item, it's unethical.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

It looks like Index 01 has a 2 year (24 month) battery. Apple airpods, while rechargable, have a unit life of 36 months or as short as 18 months.

I assume, following the same logic, that you consider airpods unethical? If so, in your opinion, how long should a device last before it wouldn't be unethical?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I assume you mean because it will eventually wear out its battery and be unserviceable? If so, how is that different than the Pebble watch itself?

[–] narp@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think the ring is not rechargeable at all..

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

It looks like Index 01 has a 2 year (24 month) battery. Apple airpods, while rechargable, have a unit life of 36 months or as short as 18 months (with heavy use).

I assume, following the same logic, airpods would be unethical? If so, in your opinion, how long should a device last before it wouldn’t be unethical?

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Airpods batteries can be replaced, and parts are available on ifixit.

Index isn't released yet, so maybe there will be a ifixit page created for them. but if the silver oxide batteries are as bad as the ones my mom's hearing aids use, I can't see this thing lasting more than a year.

[–] erebion@news.erebion.eu 1 points 3 days ago

They are unethical because they're hard to repair, but cam be used after discharging, while the ring will just become trash.

The two years will only be reachable by using it little, which defeats its purpose, as well.

[–] coltn@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

No matter what, whether it's pebble or apple, non-serviceable batteries are "atrocious" and "unethical". While expected from apple; it would be nice to expect more from pebble.