this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
653 points (99.2% liked)
Data is Beautiful
3570 readers
811 users here now
Be respectful
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Having family members die of these things doesn't make people aware heart disease exist? It's only if it's reported in the New York Times reports on it that makes people aware of things?
And no it's not all that flashy when my grandfather dies of a heart attack at the age of 87. That's part of your stats on the common causes of death, right? It's sad for those that knew him, but do you expect a story about an octogenarian dying of a heart attack to make the front page of the NY Times? What would that accomplish more than an obituary stating people should give to a charity in lieu of flowers? Maybe with some more funding to medical research my grandfather could've lived to 88 or 89! But the damn NY Times decided it was more important to report on someone dying in the prime of their life instead of elderly people dying. Those insensitive bastards!
Not everyone has the privilege of their family members making it to their 80s or later. Heart disease, diabetes, cancer. I've had family members die in their 40s, 50s, 60s, but almost never later than 70s.
Why does it matter if journalists report on this stuff more? Because a crazy amount of people are dying from these top causes, and they are not just "shit that happens." They have causes, and they are preventable.