philosophy

20240 readers

2 users here now

Other philosophy communities have only interpreted the world in various ways. The point, however, is to change it. [ x ]

"I thunk it so I dunk it." - Descartes

Short Attention Span Reading Group: summary, list of previous discussions, schedule

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

Leon_Grotsky@hexbear.net

Felt cocky, so i tried reading Hegel (hexbear.net)

submitted 4 days ago by Big@hexbear.net to c/philosophy@hexbear.net

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

And boy howdy does my head hurt.

I'm almost through the preface, and i have NO clue what he's talking about.

So far, the only thing I've gotten is something about how a result is determined by the path that lead to it, and that a negation is not a destruction of something but just a further step forward.

But I have no fucking clue about his other concepts like Notion, Subjective/Objective, what he means by Science or how to piece it all together.

It really feels like walking in, mid conversation, in a foreign language.

Is the rest of the book easier to read, or should I just call it quits here?

I just wanted to better understand dialectics lmao

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] GeckoChamber@hexbear.net 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In my opinion, unless you are an academic or at least an exceptionally academic type, there is no reason to read Hegel's works, the guy did not write very clearly. If you are looking for a more readable book about dialectics, I would consider Bertell Ollman's Dance of the Dialectic.

[–] ComradeRat@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago

Absolutely amazing book