this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
633 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

81451 readers
4485 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Self-driving cars are often marketed as safer than human drivers, but new data suggests that may not always be the case.

Citing data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Electrek reports that Tesla disclosed five new crashes involving its robotaxi fleet in Austin. The new data raises concerns about how safe Tesla’s systems really are compared to the average driver.

The incidents included a collision with a fixed object at 17 miles per hour, a crash with a bus while the Tesla vehicle was stopped, a crash with a truck at four miles per hour, and two cases where Tesla vehicles backed into fixed objects at low speeds.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Are they even insured like typical insurance?

If Tesla owns it, don't they just pay out of pocket as needed, they don't actually have a monthly payment to themselves or anything?

[–] copd@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

There's no way, then why can't I drive around "uninsured" with thr promise I'll pay out of my pocket for any damage.

[–] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure if this is available everywhere, but in California you can put up a bond in lieu of insurance with the DMV, either with your own money or with a surety bond company.

So you can do it, they just require proof in the form of the bond that the money is available when needed. They won't just take your word for it. They might take the word of a company with a $1.3 trillion market cap, which is probably a bad idea. You get hit with one of these fuckers and instead of the admittedly shitty but known process of dealing with an insurance company, now you have to deal with a huge company that doesn't want to admit their dumb camera only system is at fault.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

This is what I was thinking was possible ya. If they have enough money, they could just cover it themselves.

I really don't know if that can be done everywhere though.

And ya, as an individual self insuring this way, it would be a disaster going against a behemoth like Tesla.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Companies routinely purchase insurance against their own liabilities.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

What auto insurance company would insure an unproven tech like this at a reasonable rate?

If someones willing to insure it, it must cost an arm and a leg at least at this point in time in the cycle?