this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
571 points (93.6% liked)

People Twitter

9615 readers
274 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And yes, I know people will say block keywords and communities, but people don't understand some communities have rules and people must follow them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 week ago (10 children)

This got reported as being not twitter or equal. I'm kind of on the fence about this. I see their point, but the original was twitter. Please tell me what you think in the comments, not just downvote or upvote. This will guide me in the future if we have any more posts like this.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 days ago

We need to keep the cycle going. Remove the post, so that OP can make their own fuck this I'm done post.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Do whatever, ruleslawyering is not helpful. Is the community enjoying it? It stays. Is it detrimental? It gets removed. The "rules" should be more like guidelines to suggest to posters what type of content the intent of the community is, not what type of content is permissible.

Is someone posting vaguely in the direction of the intent of the community? That would be good enough for me.

Anyone trying to separate posts into increasingly niche communities (like the asinine dontdeadopeninside and nosafetysmokingfirst split on reddit) is not helping the community of posters and lurkers.

[–] stiffyGlitch@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

The “rules” should be more like guidelines to suggest to posters what type of content the intent of the community is, not what type of content is permissible.

I totally agree. Rules number 1, 4, and 5 are the most important, in my opinion. I'm not saying that there shouldn't be rules in the communities; there definitely should be rules. Guidelines for what to post instead of what not to post will probably be more beneficial.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I don’t tend to think of wpt as specifically twitter posts. Maybe that’s how it started, but over time it has become a more generalized “screenshots of short text posts” type of thing in my mind. The “or similar” in the rules leaves a lot of ambiguity, but in my mind Twitter was always about short text posts, so any short text posts would fall under that “similar” umbrella. I wouldn’t object to seeing something from Facebook, Instagram, or Reddit being posted here as long as it was a text post and not super long, so it feels disingenuous to complain about a Lemmy post being here.

[–] Ashenlux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago

Especially since, twitter isn't even twitter anymore. And the only thing you are going to get from what twitter has become is ragebait, bots, and racism. For "whitepeopletwitter" to continue and not end up dying from lack of content, it needs to start opening up to other sources that stick with the same idea as what twitter used to supply.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

I think it's the mod reason for removing that the person who reported it had a problem with.

[–] Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 57 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It probably shouldn't be allowed in the future, but given that it has > 300 up-votes and is only now spurring a finer definition of the rule, I think it warrants an exception. If OP reads this, they now know to post this kinda thing in a different community in the future. But removing this particular post seems a little harsh.

Edit: This is an awesome approach to moderation btw. People like you make lemmy great, thank you!

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I was searching for a community to post it, but I couldn't find any. This one seemed closer to the idea l, a post where it says something. I also think I saw a photo from Facebook in this community, so...m Maybe we need a community about posts like these, but not twitter.

[–] stiffyGlitch@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

You can post it in my community. Or Lemmy Shitpost. Here's a link:https://lemmy.world/c/itsashitworld

[–] UltraMagnus@startrek.website 3 points 6 days ago

Is there a lemmydrama like subredditdrama? Maybe a fedidrama community would work. I don't know if one exists yet

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 16 points 1 week ago

I havent read the rules of the comm. but ive always perceived whitepeopletwitter as a place to post text based social media screenshots.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

People like this need to accept and understand that we don't want to talk about US politics everywhere, all the time.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 6 points 1 week ago

It should be in YPTB, but they’ll just use that as more proof of their “outrage”.

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Fighting to remove as many posts as possible on Lemmy when we barely get any posts at all doesn't make sense; ignore the people requesting you take a popular post down for some potential technicality.

[–] Lemmynated@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

You’re right.

I’m going to start posting my gunpla in cooking communities because we need content.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

We have trolls here too. I'm okay if they take a hike, lol.

[–] melvisntnormal@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

the original was twitter

As in, the post was originally on Twitter? I'm not sure what this means

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, that's what I mean. It was on a twitter like site.

[–] melvisntnormal@feddit.uk 9 points 1 week ago

Sounds fine to me, if this is a picture of a Twitter-like site then I don't really see an issue

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

I am not sure how this changes the "the post was against the states rules which are there for a reason and the mod was the absolute most gentle about it" facts.

Did I get the facts wrong?

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I don't see the original. All I see are Lemmy related images and that, to me, doesn't belong here.