this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
651 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

81451 readers
4422 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Analog@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I just dislike sensationalism.

If the truth isn’t enough, then I don’t want it.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You dislike the truth. You should watch Tobacco CEOs deny that cigarettes were an addiction.

https://youtu.be/A6B1q22R438

[–] XLE@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hopefully Analog returns to Lemmy in far less than 12 days, and heavily edits their comments to reflect their error

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah, that was some serious ninja editing.

[–] Analog@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What editing? Didn’t edit either if those posts.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The comments I replied to were heavily edited after I replied. You can comment at the bottom with an Edit: and then explain what you changed. Otherwise, it is known as a ninja edit and it is generally frowned upon because it makes the conversations convoluted. Cheers!

[–] XLE@piefed.social 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Since you care deeply about truth or something, when will you be correcting your comments that, at best, lack huge amounts of truth that change the contents you put forth? At best, you accidentally skipped multiple paragraphs that contradict your claims. At less best, you knew better.

[–] Analog@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Post said he said a thing. He did not say the thing. Not complicated.

Could have worded the post title to be accurate: didn’t. Instead, lied.

Words matter. Truth matters. Interpretation is how you get religious people performing atrocities based on millennia old writings.

“[Asshole] Squirms Under Questioning, Refuses To Admit 16hrs A Day Is Addictive Behavior.”

Not hard.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Your comments now are a huge shift from

"That sounds like problematic use," the Instagram boss answered. He did not call it an addiction.

He also didn’t say it was a tomato.

Seems that, in the interest of accuracy, you should update them, lest you be the thing you claim others are.

[–] Analog@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I recommend a re-read, my good buddy, of all my posts in this thread.

Truth. Not lies. Not conjecture.

This can be the truth that he was dodging the question.

Don’t say people said things they didn’t say. Simple.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Your original post was a lie, or dumb accident, through omission. And now that you know better, you are lying intentionally in it.

You know damn well they were talking about addiction and not tomatoes. And yet you dishonestly tell people those two things are the same.

[–] Analog@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Did the douchebag say exactly what the post title said he said?

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Have you walked back your lie comparing the actual topic of addiction to the irrelevant topic of tomatoes? Make sure you post an explicit correction along with an apology.

"If the truth isn't enough, I don't want it." Please demonstrate.

[–] Analog@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You support lying. Good to know.

If you don’t understand the tomato comment, no wonder you’re having so much trouble with the interpretation and lying topics!

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

There's no way you can say that the inquiry was about tomatoes as much as it was about addiction. Not without being incredibly stupid or incredibly dishonest.

You are now intentionally leaving out multiple paragraphs of content that would prove the opposite, which adds to your deception.

Demonstrate a grain of honesty by fixing your lies and maybe you'll have a right to talk.

[–] Analog@lemmy.ml 1 points 51 minutes ago

You really don’t understand and are just driving the point home the more you post. I feel kinda sorry for you.

[–] XLE@piefed.social -1 points 1 day ago

@RemindMe@feddit.org about correcting misinformation in 24 hours

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah and you probably think headlines that say "suspect dead after ICE-involved incident" is fine and that "ICE performs summary execution of innocent person" is sensationalism.