this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
867 points (96.9% liked)

Political Memes

11519 readers
1918 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Duplodicus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Agreed but the cause isn't inherent to only one ideology. It's industrialism and how we handle it that creates the issue

[–] lingh0e@lemmy.film 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Which is why I'm suggesting that, perhaps, we would make better decisions if the means of production were controlled by the workers.

[–] Duplodicus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In the example given it came down to the supposed needs of the larger society. The fishers owning the means of production ≠ as owning the Sea.

If the workers controlled the means of production at a coal mine are they going to stop mining coal because it is horrifically bad for everyone else or are they going to see to their needs first by selling coal?

The solution to these problems is not going to be fixed by changing economic ideologies to one proven to not be any better.

[–] lingh0e@lemmy.film 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Funny you use that example. There have been concerted efforts to train coal miners in other fields in an effort to curb coal consumption. Regions that embraced changing to new sources of income in other industries tended to fair much better than the regions that refused such programs.

We have progressed enough as a civilization that we can absolutely change our destructive ways. "My great grand pappy mined these hills, why shouldn't I" isn't a viable excuse these days.

[–] Duplodicus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

But for those that own the mine there is no compelling reason to do so if they risk starvation. Workers owning the means of production would not solve environmental problems.